![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUFjNhVqm7a6wMQIw4y7v5AnTmOBjurstVr0D4S8FAmYNjoCVbTQ6ZIiHkJb60ITrgDVUicX6cY9Uvnk20XYp8juNa1jcGDuOk8aX_OfCPIiE9buJdmyuYulKhVMfZ2AyeI4LWrZdnwsI/s400/falling+off.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYgYRhMm85BoyD-DmJCijHwa3wwpeQf3uZ-aRVL6d3r6JZ7Q2GjPOYyOSOVCUWe9Xi2T91hHJtKE_n4ITin1C-k6cEGXXU1c2hmV71QV2CI8buwIeLy8hyphenhyphenSRzy_z2HVKC9cI3uGtJ1Tlc/s400/occidental+accident+10.jpg)
So as this abstraction fing is kinda new to me… it’s been rather difficult to gauge the success of my efforts on those grounds - apart from the fact that I find my drawings beautiful. I know some would find that statement simplistic, but I do remember hearing David Batchelor speak of ‘pleasure’ as opposed to ‘beauty’ in relation to the reception of work. That sounds ok I spose - its more definite as a term, you’re less likely to refute its credibility - pleasure is pleasure you can‘t argue with that...
In some ways I’ve taken a rather predictable route, if we take abstraction on the surface as a means of visualising the interior. The archetypal image of the artist removed from the world - I’ve been looking at books on abstract expressionism recently. Strangely although the artist themselves would stress the absence of politics, the social and cultural context surrounding it almost makes that impossible – there is always a position, which equates to a politic.