It’s inevitable, dare
I say it, doubting ones own authenticity - feeling like a series of reflections
of the environment. I could be mistaken but I read somewhere that Barnett
Newton cut himself off critically and socially for a spell in a bid to escape
it. Anyways I found myself also heading back towards the existentialist
territory. It is always rather
attractive at first and then you don’t necessarily find answers you want, but
more answers and references to a load of other philosophers you haven’t read. I
came across Adorno’s The jargon of Authenticity – it was just and inkling
really - kinda to do with the book project but probably more to do with the
condition mentioned above.
Reading through
the introduction at some point he began refuting Kierkegaard’s idea of ‘radicalinward love’, Adorno found this love uncannily similar to the spiritual love of
Christianity. The book attempted to rattle a kind of pseudo mysticism
he identified in German existentialist philosophy and its community. Adorno critiqued
the ideal of the autonomous intellect, and reckoned that retreating inwards (to
exist serenely) was the life of a dominated individual. For him existence
unaffected by the ‘concrete’ world and its dictates was impossible.
He was obviously talking
on a grand political scale, but (as he might admit himself) you can attempt to
apply these ideas/theories to anything. So what does that say of the ‘creative
subject’ who struggles to find assurances about what they put in the world? What
makes someone an artist? Is there a set of criteria and would we all be in
agreement upon what they are? Probably not, which is why so many factions exist
so people can agree to agree – implicit, complicit, whatever you want to call it…
But in
cutting that hairball - I think I had submitted to making something badly, but keeping that conviction and hope in arriving
somewhere through the uncertainty. Isn’t that what Kierkegaard would call a
‘Knight of Faith’? We’ve all become accustomed to the idea of getting closer to yourself or a higher being through ritual. Considering Adorno’s critique, perhaps the existentialists were just acknowledging the need for transcendence, no matter show rational or irrational it is.
It just is…
No comments:
Post a Comment